Money’s Too Tight to Mention…But Maybe a Student Loan Match Would Help

/in , , , , , , ,

by Lyn Domenick

By now you have probably seen countless summaries of the recently enacted legislation that includes what is commonly known as SECURE 2.0. One of the new features that has been brewing for a while is the concept of a 401(k) plan match based on qualified student loan payments for its eligible employees. Because this is effective January 1, 2024, interested plan sponsors should begin now evaluating the merits of adding such a program. The student loan match provision permits (but does not require) a plan to contribute matching contributions based on the amount of qualified student loan payments made by its employees who are otherwise eligible to make deferrals under the 401(k) plan. The plan must match qualified student loan payments on the same basis as elective deferrals under the plan, including the application of any plan or IRS limits on the amount that is matched and on the match itself. If a participant is making both elective deferrals and paying on a student loan, the matching formula would be applied to both (subject to applicable limits). Eligible participants would self-certify that they are making qualified student loan payments, which avoids the need for the sponsor to verify payment. Student loan matching contributions may also be implemented in a 403(b) plan or governmental 457(b) plan. Read more

We Are Family – IRS Regulations Fix the “Family Glitch” in Connection with ACA Coverage

/in , ,

by Elizabeth Nedrow

One of the key remaining features of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is that certain employers must offer their employees medical coverage, or else pay a penalty. The details of that “employer shared responsibility payment” (ESRP) are many. One of those details is that the employer coverage must be “affordable.” Affordability looks at how much of an employee’s household income goes toward premiums.

As originally implemented, affordability was measured by reference to the premiums charged for employee-only coverage. The premium cost for family or other tiers of coverage wasn’t taken into account. Some critics called this the “family glitch.” Starting in 2023, that changes. New IRS regulations require that in 2023, affordability is measured by looking at the employee’s premium cost for family coverage. Read more

Time Is On My Side: Some Retirement Plan Amendment Deadlines Pushed Back

/in , , , , , , , , ,

by Brenda Berg

The IRS has given plan sponsors more time to adopt some – but apparently not all – retirement plan amendments reflecting law changes in the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (SECURE Act), the Bipartisan Miners Act of 2019 (Miners Act), and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). Notice 2022-23, issued August 3, 2022, generally provides that the deadline to adopt these amendments is extended to December 31, 2025. This is the deadline for qualified plans regardless of the plan year, and this deadline also applies to 403(b) plans and collectively bargained plans. Governmental plans generally have until 90 days after the third regular legislative session of the body with the authority to amend the plan that begins after December 31, 2023. Read more

Take A Chance On Me? Could We Finally See Legislation Expanding Section 1042 Deferral to S Corp ESOPS?

/in , , ,

by Elizabeth Nedrow

One of the most popular incentives for small business owners to establish an ESOP (employee stock ownership plan) is the ability to defer tax on the gain they will receive in the sale through the Section 1042 deferral. If certain requirements are met (most notably that the ESOP must end up owning at least 30% of the company), the selling shareholders can defer tax on their gain by investing the proceeds in certain types of “qualified replacement property.” Read more

I’m Leaving On A Jet Plane…Is Abortion Care Travel a Covered Benefit?

/in , , , ,

by Benjamin Gibbons

The focus of this week’s post is on an emerging hot topic, abortion care travel reimbursement. Reimbursement for travel to obtain abortion care was already something being considered by a number of companies in response to the recent Texas fetal heartbeat law and similar laws in other states. With the recently leaked Supreme Court draft opinion that stands to overturn Roe v. Wade, both the need for such a benefit and employers’ interest in offering travel reimbursements has increased significantly. If Roe is overturned, access to abortions will be largely prohibited in the 13 states with so called “trigger laws” and could be significantly restricted in at least 13 other states. Read more

What Happens in a Small Town Stays in a Small Town … Until the DOL Doubles Down on Mental Health Parity Compliance

/in , , , , , , ,

by Alex Smith

The Department of Labor (DOL), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Department of Treasury (collectively, the Departments) recently issued their joint report to Congress regarding their Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) enforcement activities as required under the MHPAEA and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA). The report contained insights regarding the DOL’s enforcement of the new MHPAEA reporting and disclosure requirements related to non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) established by the CAA. For additional information about the CAA’s new MHPAEA reporting and disclosure requirements, please see our previous blog post (as well as earlier blog posts). Read more

This is the End: Employers Must Provide Notice of the Expiring COBRA Subsidy Period

/in , , , ,

by Brenda Berg

The COBRA subsidy from COVID-19 stimulus bill – The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) – is nearing an end and in many cases requires employers to provide notices by September 15. The COBRA subsidy covered 100% of COBRA premiums for assistance-eligible individuals for periods of coverage beginning on or after April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021. We previously covered the details of the subsidy in these posts: These Boots Are Made For Walking…But If You Quit, You Might Not Get the COBRA Subsidy and Lean on Me…New Guidance on Federal COBRA Subsidy. Because eligible individuals have 60 days to elect COBRA, there are still a couple months of coverage periods for which individuals may still be able to elect the subsidy. Read more

Here Comes the Sun: The DOL Intends to Shine the Light on Mental Health Parity

/in , , , , , , , , , ,

by Bret F. Busacker

We previously blogged about the new Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) reporting and disclosure requirements established by the Consolidated Appropriation Act, 2021 (CAA).

As a refresher, employers and carriers that sponsor group health plans are now required to provide upon request a full analysis of the process followed by the plan in establishing non-quantitative treatment limitations (NQTLs) for the plan and the impact these NQTL’s have on mental health and substance use disorder (MH/SUD) benefits provided by the plan.  This disclosure requirement went into effect on February 10, 2021.

The DOL has recently signaled its intent to focus on MHPAEA issues in filing suit against United Healthcare Insurance Company (“UHIC”) and United Behavioral Health (“UBH”).   Read more

I Can’t Go For That, No Balance Billing

/in , , ,

by Leslie Thomson

The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 (“CAA”) established, among other things, new protections from surprise billing and excessive cost-sharing for consumers receiving health care items and services (“No Surprises Act”).

Most group health plans and health insurance issuers that offer group or individual health insurance coverage have a network of providers and health care facilities that agree to accept a specific payment amount for their services. Providers and facilities that are not part of a plan’s or issuer’s network usually charge higher amounts than the in-network providers and facilities. Group health plans and issuers typically do not cover the entire out-of-network costs, leaving the individual with higher costs than if they had been seen by an in-network provider. In many cases, the out-of-network provider may bill the individual for the difference between the billed charge and the amount paid by their plan or insurance, unless prohibited by state law (known as “balance billing”). Read more

Lean on Me . . . New Guidance on Federal COBRA Subsidy

/in , , , ,

By Kevin Selzer

We posted on April 6th about the COBRA subsidy that was made available through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA).  In short, the law gives certain individuals who are entitled to COBRA due to a reduction of hours or involuntary termination of employment a 100% subsidy for health coverage that is continued under COBRA or equivalent state laws. Read more